Oklahoma: Census Bureau Issues Profile of the Older Worker

In a continuation of its partnership with 31 states on a series of reports on workers 55 and older, the Census Bureau has released its report on Oklahoma, the 13th state to be released in the series. Among the highlights of the report--"The Geographic Distribution and Characteristics of Older Workers in Oklahoma: 2004":

• 14.5% of workers were 55 and older, while 3.4% were 65 and older;
• statewide, the educational services industry had the highest proportion of or workers 55 and older, with 21.1% of its workers in that age group; and
• the state's health care and social assistance industry employed the greatest number of older workers, with about 15.9% of the workers 55 and older being in that sector.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics What's New (August 14, 2008)

Singapore: Tripartite Implementation Group Launches Re-employment Web Portal

Singapore's Tripartite Implementation Workgroup (TIWG) has launched a web portal to help employers and employees get started on re-employment before the reemployment legislation takes effect in 2012. The portal can be found at www.re-employment.sg and it is intended to serve as a one-stop information and resource center for employers and employees on re-employment.

Among other things, the portal includes case studies of companies that have successfully implemented re-employment, lists seminars and workshops on re-employment, and provides information on assistance programs for companies that may require additional resources to implement re-employment. The portal also lists the workforce age profiles of over 250 companies from sectors such as hotels and restaurants, manufacturing and wholesale and retail trade; these companies have voluntarily posted their workforce age profiles on the portal in support of age-friendly and fair employment practices.

Source: Ministry of Manpower News Release (August 13, 2008)

Survey: More Companies Are Considering Implementing Phased Retirement Programs

A Hewitt Associates survey of more than 140 mid-size and large employers has found that 55% have already evaluated the impact that potential retirements could have on their organization and 61% have developed or will develop special programs to retain targeted, near-retirement employees. Even though only 21% believe that phased retirement is critical to their company's human resources strategy today, 61% believe so when looking ahead 5 years.

"With the rising tide of boomer retirees, employers will be losing key talent at a time when attracting and retaining skilled workers will be more important than ever," explained Allen Steinberg, a principal at Hewitt Associates. "At the same time, rising medical costs, lengthening life spans and the declining prevalence of traditional pension and retiree medical benefits mean that employees will either have to work longer, save more or live with significantly less than they are accustomed to. As these trends converge, we believe phased retirement programs will continue to become more attractive options for both employers and employees—they provide employers with new ways to retain critical talent and, at the same time, help employees meet their needs."

In addition, the survey finds that 72% of employers said that retaining the experience, knowledge and skills of older workers was the most important benefit to them in offering phased retirement programs. However, 65% said that offering part-time employment (on a year-round basis) represented one of the most effective ways of retaining near-retirement workers.

In addition to focusing on retention, 45% of the employers indicated they currently have policies in place that limit the ability to rehire retirees, but 46 % said they were likely to review their rehiring policies in the future.

Source: Hewitt Associates News Release (July 30, 2008)

Commentary: Proposals to Change U.S. Benefits Laws to Account for Worker Longevity Increases

John Turner, coeditor of "Work Options for Older Americans", has written an article on "Work Options for Older Americans: Employee Benefits for the Era of Living Longer" published in the Third Quarter 2008 issue of Benefits Quarterly. According to Turner, "[m]any of our social policies and employee benefit policies were designed for an era when people had shorter life expectancy," so that "[w]ith the demographic changes occurring, it is time to reexamine those policies to fit the realities of the new demographic era of living longer."

Public policy should provide older people with more choices, rather than fewer. Work effort by the elderly that is all "push" (due to financial need) and no "pull" (due to attractive jobs) is not socially acceptable. Thus, an increase in labor force participation by the elderly that is motivated mainly by a drop in their reservation wages (the minimum wage at which they are willing to work) because of decreases in pension income would not be an acceptable development. Much more acceptable is the idea that workers who may have to supplement their pensions are also induced to work because of attractive wages, employee benefits, flexible work hours or the nonpecuniary aspects of work. Some of the attractive nonpecuniary aspects of work for older people include socialization, structure to the day and self-esteem. Others include shorter hours, greater vacations and greater flexibility in work schedules.

Among other things, Turner suggests that, since it is difficult for workers to collect a pension while phasing out work, the government could take a proactive stance towards flexible employment and provide guidance to employers, who are chary of experimenting under threat of losing their tax deductions. Another suggestion, reflective of increased longevity, to help encourage defined benefit plans, is to allow employers to index initial benefits received at retirement to increases in life expectancy.

Source: Benefits Quarterly "Work Options for Older Americans: Employee Benefits for the Era of Living Longer" (July 31, 2008)

AARP Survey Explores Plans and Motivations for Michigan Seniors Working Past Retirement.

A survey of AARP residents in Michigan finds that retiring comfortably at age 62 is not a reality for many who expect to work well past the traditional retirement age due to increased longevity and rising health care costs. In particular, 36% work full-time and 9% part-time, and 49% consider it extremely (27%) or very (22%) likely that they will continue working beyond retirement. The most common reasons for continuing to work cited were;

• health insurance coverage (54%);
• enjoy working (45%);
• need for extra income (44%); and
• paying for prescription drugs (41%).

The survey also reports that 50% plan to work part-time and pursue hobbies when they reach the retirement age, while 37% intend to work at their current jobs as long as possible. With respect to when they will retire, 23% think they will retire at age 60-64, 37% at 65-69, and 20% at age 70 or older.

Sources: AARP Research Report (July 2008); Battle Creek (MI) Enquirer "Work at 50-Plus: New age of possibility and purpose" (July 1, 2008)

Survey: Employers Looking for Educated Older Workers

A report issued by the Urban Institute suggests that baby boomers looking for jobs in growth fields that welcome older workers "will want to dust off their diplomas rather than their treadmills" since most of the fastest-growing occupations that already employ above-average shares of workers age 55 and older rely on an educated workforce. The report also discusses the personal and social benefits of increased work by older adults and the reasons why boomers are likely to try to work longer than earlier generations and examines whether employers will want older workers and how changes in the nature of work, demands for different occupations, the characteristics of older workers, and overall labor force growth will affect the future demand for older workers.

According to the study--"Will Employers Want Aging Boomers?"--by Gordon B.T. Mermin, Richard W. Johnson, and Eric J. Toder, employers value older workers for their maturity, experience and work ethic, but worry about out of date skills and high costs. Future jobs will require less physical demands and more cognitive and interpersonal skills, trends that favor educated older workers, but job opportunities for less educated older workers may remain limited.

The faster growing areas that require education include personal financial advisors, veterinarians, social and community service managers, surveyors, environmental scientists and geoscientists, registered nurses, and instructional coordinators. The list also includes postsecondary teachers, archivists and curators, social workers, management analysts, pharmacists, counselors, and business operation specialists. The fastest-growing area friendly to senior workers is personal and home care aides. Other categories that depend less on academic credentials include usherers, animal trainers, locksmiths, and brokerage clerks.

In their conclusion to the complete discussion paper, the authors recommend that, in order to promote employment at older ages, policymakers might consider the following steps to increase demand for older workers:

• make Medicare the primary payer for workers with employer-provided health insurance;
• reduce legal uncertainties surrounding formal phased retirement programs;
• allow in-service distribution of defined benefit pensions at age 59 1/2;
• better target government training and employment services to older workers; and
• take steps to increase employer awareness of the value of older workers.

Source: Urban Institute Press Release (July 23, 2008)

Research: How Older Workers Value Employee Health Insurance

An issue brief published by the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College analyzes data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to compare the value that workers place on health insurance with their perceptions about the cost of coverage. In particular, in "How Much Do Older Workers Value Employee Health Insurance?", that authors--Leora Friedberg, Wei Sun, and Anthony Webb--sought to compare cost with willingness-to-pay by those without insurance and those without.

The authors' analysis revealed "substantial differences between the valuations that the currently insured place on health insurance and the amount that the currently uninsured would be willing to pay in order to obtain coverage." However, while the "average willingness to pay among the uninsured is less than the likely cost of providing coverage, moderate targeted subsidies might generate substantial take-up under a voluntary program, while reducing the number of households made worse off under a mandatory program."

Source: Center for Retirement Research at Boston College Brief IB#8-9 (July 11, 2008)

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics Spotlight Highlights Trends towards More Older Workers

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS)has issued a spotlight on older workers, finding that between 1977 and 2007, employment of workers 65 and over increased 101%, compared to a much smaller increase of 59% for total employment. For men over 65, the increase was 75%, but for women it was 147%. In addition, BLS notes that while the number of employed people age 75 and over is relatively small (0.8% of the employed in 2007), they had the most dramatic gain--increasing 172% between 1977 and 2007.

Among other topics addressed by the BLS reports:

• This increase does not just reflect the aging of the baby-boom population, since none had yet reached age 65.
• While part-time work among older workers began trending upward from 1990 to 1995, that trend has had a marked reversal with full-time employment rising sharply, with the number of older workers on full-time work schedules nearly doubling between 1995 and 2007 and the number working part-time rising just 19%; full-timers accounted for a majority among older workers, with 56% in 2007, up from 44% in 1995.
• In 1977, about one-third of employed women 65 and older were married, but by 2007, married women accounted for nearly one-half of these workers.

BLS expects the growth in employment to continue. During the period 2006-2016, workers age 55-64 are expected to climb by 36.5% and the number of workers between the ages of 65 and 74 and those aged 75 and up are predicted to soar by more than 80%.

BLS also provides an audio file of this report.

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics "Spotlight on Older Workers (July 2008)

Japan: Retention of Older Workers Becoming More Difficult with Changing Evaluation Systems

A Japan government white paper has been released finding increased unhappiness among Japanese workers who have complaints over pay, lack of vacations and a decline in morale. Among other things, the paper also reports that retaining older staff has been a challenge for companies trying to avert a labor crunch.

According to a Reuters story on the paper, "older workers were switching jobs because they failed to get along with colleagues or were unhappy with how they were being evaluated at companies using performance-based management."

Under Japan's traditional lifetime employment system, employees were guaranteed promotions and pay increases as they grew older, regardless of performance.

"For an effective performance-based system, efforts are needed to improve the implementation of the wage system, such as making clear the basis for evaluation and providing detailed explanations for the assessments," the white paper said.

Source: Reuters "Japanese workers more unhappy, government report says" (July 22, 2008)